Archive for June 4, 2006

Big Love and the Law

Reading about that Republican congressional candidate with the bigamy problem (hat tip: blogenfreude) got me wondering about Big Love. The Henricksons appear to believe that they could go to jail for what they’re doing…but my understanding has always been that you’re only committing bigamy if you legally marry more than one spouse. The Henricksons are all religiously married, but only one of the marriages is legal. So I was wondering: is this actually a felony?

In Utah, the answer is yes:

A person is guilty of bigamy when, knowing he has a husband or wife or knowing the other person has a husband or wife, the person purports to marry another person or cohabits with another person. [emphasis added]

And in case it’s unclear how broad that is, a recent Utah Supreme Court decision upholding the statute (against a freedom-of-religion challenge) upheld the interpretation of ‘purports to marry’ as including purely religious marriage ceremonies with no legal confirmation of the marriage.

I did a quick check in a few other states and as far as I can tell, none of them have comparable language; the bigamy statute in California, for example, bigamy is just defined as ‘marrying’ more than one person. I’m not certain, but Utah may well be unique in this respect.

The reason is obvious; it’s the same reason a prohibition on polygamous marriage is in the state constitution:

No inhabitant of this State shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship; but polygamous or plural marriages are forever prohibited.

I don’t have any great point to make about any of this. I just thought it was interesting.

[Cross-posted at If I Ran the Zoo]

Sunday Sierrablogging


West Kennedy Lake, Monarch Divide, Kings Canyon National Park

[Cross-posted at If I Ran the Zoo]

Bom dia

In Brazilian Portuguese, “d” when followed by “i” or “e” is pronounced as a “j”. So “dia” sounds like “jia”.

Now this is interesting. This morning on the elevator someone said “bom dia” and I briefly thought he was French; that he’d said “bonjour”. I never could figure out how “day” was related to “jour”, but I can figure a trajectory from day to dios to dia to jour.

Still not getting the good-to-bon connection, but whatever.