Archive for January 19, 2009

Monday Movie Review: Shadow of a Doubt

Shadow of a Doubt (1943) 10/10
Charlie Oakley (Joseph Cotten), who is being followed by the police, decides to skip town and visit his sister’s family, including his adoring niece, Young Charlie (Theresa Wright). Quickly we learn that Uncle Charlie is a murderer, bringing poisonous hatred to small town life. Directed by Alfred Hitchcock.

Shadow of a Doubt is a difficult movie to review, because it is one of the most written-about movies of all time. It has been analyzed, dissected, and mapped for its construction, hidden meanings, echoes, reflections, symbolism, and structure by the greatest film critics ever. What, then, can I bring to the table? I’m not sure I even understand all the symbolism or the structure.

The basics of it, that everything in Shadow of a Doubt is in some way a reflection and opposite of everything else, is pretty clear. The lovely town of Santa Rosa is the reflection of the dark, run-down town Uncle Charlie escapes. Young Charlie is the twin/opposite of Uncle Charlie. The murder-obsessed neighbor is the twin/opposite of the real murders.

I think it’s impossible to view a Hitchcock movie without seeing the “Hitchcock” as well as the “movie.” His is a body of work that is distinctive, personal, and interconnected by his presence at the helm. So, while each movie stands alone, each is also a piece of the whole. (He completed 59 full-length films, some of which are rarities, and I’ve seen 28.)

At some level, all of Hitchcock’s films are about misogyny. They examine it (Notorious), laugh about it (To Catch a Thief), revel in it (The Birds), and delve into its depths (Psycho). Shadow of a Doubt is very interested in condemning it, but not without allowing deep hatred, in the form of Uncle Charlie, to be seductive and exciting.

Young Charlie is an innocent teenager, worshipful of her uncle. Her mother (Patricia Collinge) is innocent as well, a somewhat silly and naive woman. Charlie loves his sister, but she is surely everything he hates about women and about the world: She is defined by a small town and a small life that doesn’t reach beyond family and friends. As the movie opens, we might easily imagine Young Charlie headed along the same path, and we might even share Uncle Charlie’s disdain.

But Uncle Charlie is a poison, and as Young Charlie discovers this, her response is not to retreat into innocence, but to become resourceful, and a worthy match for him. While at first we can laugh, with Uncle Charlie, at small town and small-minded life, ultimately we root, with Young Charlie, for its values. This is truly not Hitchcock’s typical take on women, on resourcefulness, or on innocence. Hitch even has us rooting for the blandly romantic cop by the end, which again, not his usual take on cops. Ultimately, the cop places himself in service to Young Charlie’s power play with Uncle Charlie, rather than in strict service to the law. Charlie must defeat the demon herself.

All this is kind of conceptual without talking about the movie. It’s beautifully filmed, the acting is great, and Hume Cronyn is very funny. It has the kind of lush sense of presence that people mean when they say “classic.” The dialogue is sharp, and the screenplay brings tension and surprise.

Snark line

Okay, so someone on a Wicca board said (I paraphrase): ‘Someone, I think one of Deb Lipp’s downlines,* said something snarky about…’ And I responded by saying ‘All of my downline are snark. It’s a requirement of initiation.’

Ha I’m funny.

Anyway, so there I was in Evn‘s comment section, being all braggy about how cool Basket of Kisses is, and Yvonne says “Snark line rulez.”

Snark line. Took me a minute. That’s what we’re called now. Huh.

*Note for my non-Wiccan readers: In traditional Wicca, your downline are people who are descended from you in an initiatory line, e.g. the initiates of my initiates.

The miraculous Hudson River plane crash

So, I’m as transfixed as everyone by the amazing survival of 155 passengers and crew from US Air flight 1549. Other than “wow” a couple of thoughts occur to me.

First of all, it’s local news. And I guess everyone, once or twice, has had that experience of hearing a local story on the local news and then hearing it again on the national news. I wasn’t surprised to see the story on CNN, because you’ll see the most picayune nonsense on CNN; truly, if a truck crashes in Atlanta, you’ll see it on CNN. Why? Because they like crashes, and they have to fill 24 hours of news reporting somehow. But I was stunned to realize that it was the lead story on BBC World Service this morning. It made me stop, metaphorically, in my tracks (literally, I kept driving, because literally stopping would have been bad at that moment). Like, Wow, everyone’s talking about this. This isn’t just something that happened in New York. It happened everywhere.

I don’t want to compare it to 9/11, but as I type those sentences, that comparison arises in my mind. It has nothing to do with New York and everything to do with shared experience. Seven years ago, shared tragedy and rage. This week, shared hope and delight.

Because that’s the second thing that came up for me. I work in a fairly spacious cube farm; the cubes are roomy and we’re not in each other’s laps. Nonetheless, I can hear a lot of what is said in the cube I’m back-to-back with. When my back-to-back co-worker heard about the crash, on the phone, around 4 o’clock, I heard, and first I heard plane crash and then I heard everyone survived. And I noticed that in my mind, in my shoulders, I was ready. It was what? A millisecond? But I was ready for death and tragedy. I was ready to be numbed to it. How else was I going to feel? Heartbroken? No, there is too much, and more every day, and I was ready to be numb.

And then I wasn’t. Then it was a story of survival, of a miracle, of something to remember forever and tell your grandchildren: I survived a plane crash! A plane crash! Life vests and the evening news and yes I prayed and yes I thought I was dead and I thought of my family and imagined them going on without me and THEN IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. Yes.

And in feeling the joy of it, and watching the evening news and feeling it again, and looking at those faces and saying to myself, That is the face of someone who lived, I suddenly woke up to how full of tragedy we all are, how we are choking on it, and how different it feels to have a miracle.

Television Trivia: All solved!

You rallied with our change of format.

» Read more..

Tuesday Trivia: Television Drama

Sunday night, Mad Men won the Best Television Drama Golden Globe, and gave a shout out to Basket of Kisses, where my sister and I blog about Mad Men.

Therefore, today’s trivia is all about television dramas that have received nominations from the Golden Globes. Have at!

1. A retired astronaut. A morning DJ. A moose.
TIE: Solved by Hogan (comment #1) and L. (comment #2).

2. Some of the original concept of this show was created by Ian Fleming.
Solved by Hogan (comment #12).

3. Arguably the most famous lollipop on television.
Solved by Melville (comment #4).

4. One of the stars of this show played Mama Rose on Broadway.
TIE: Solved by Hogan (comment #1) and L. (comment #2).

5. Stars of this show have subsequently been seen on CSI, Star Trek: Voyager, and Desperate Housewives.
Solved by Tina (comment #7).

6. Father and son lawyers.
Solved by Melville (comment #5).

7. This cop show was adapted as a movie in 1999. Of the film’s stars, one stars on a Golden Globe-nominated show, and one has been nominated for multiple Golden Globes for television acting.
Solved by Melville (comment #8).

Monday Movie Review: In Bruges

In Bruges (2008) 10/10
Two hit men (Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson) hole up in Bruges, Belgium awaiting instructions from their boss (Ralph Fiennes) after a hit goes wrong. Written and directed by Martin McDonagh.

I suppose you have to categorize movies, and having conceded that, I suppose you have to categorize In Bruges as a black comedy. It is definitely funny, I laughed a lot. Yet, I did not come away from watching In Bruges feeling as though I’d just watched a comedy. It was not goofy, or silly, or campy, or jokey.

In Bruges is funny because the characters are funny. Ray (Colin Farrell, who totally deserved his Golden Globe win), is absolutely childlike. He is alternately sweet and sulky and seems to be about seven years old. You can believe him as a hit man because he has some of the amorality of a small boy. He pouts, complains, whines, and blathers on in a way that puts me entirely into giggles. Meanwhile, Ken (Gleeson) tries to control him, like a kind uncle controlling a naughty but beloved nephew, and that, too, is a riot.

Bruges is a quiet town whose tourist attractions are canals, ancient churches, and a fairy tale beauty. Ken wants to sightsee, Ray is bored. Ken wants to see the Basilica of the Blood of Christ, Ray wants a beer. It’s funny, yes, but we get to know Ray and Ken, and they are people, not funny people. Farrell and Gleeson play their characters straight, and so the laughs come naturally.

Ray is not entirely amoral; all of the killers in this film, Ray, Ken, and their boss Harry (Fiennes) have a code of honor to which they adhere. Ray is haunted by what he has done; accidentally killed a child in the course of a hit. Perhaps his childlike quality makes doing wrong more painful; although he doesn’t care about the priest he was hired to kill, his sorrow over the child is inconsolable. This is where the acting is so amazing, Ray slips in and out of grief as a fresh memory overcomes him, and this changeable quality is masterfully conveyed.

Bruges is a kind of purgatory for Ray and Ken. Go there, they’re told, and wait to see the outcome of what you’ve done. They visit churches, and then an art museum where they see Bosch’s Last Judgement, and Ray wants to know if Ken believes in heaven and hell.

As the two hit men wander through Bruges, they find a film set, where Ray meets a beautiful drug dealer (the magical Clémence Poésy) and an American dwarf (Jordan Prentice) with some strange ideas about race relations. There are also obnoxious tourists, a Dutch prostitute, and an arms dealer who likes alcoves. Finally Harry himself arrives as fate tightens around our main characters. Fiennes is kind of channeling Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast for Harry, but he’s not entirely a monster. He, too, has a moral code, infinitely strict, and his main beef with Ray (with the whole world, in fact) is that he is not as strict. He is like a foul-mouthed avenging angel, forcing all around him to line up according to his code. Which is both very funny, and not.

So, yeah, I guess we shove square peg In Bruges into the round hole of black comedy, but to me it is so much more. It has great depth of character and performance, extraordinary beauty, and a lot of warmth. It felt like a drama that made me laugh, but perhaps it was a comedy that moved me. Either way.

I am creating a new social custom

Reverse wedding showers, for people who marry (or remarry) in their 40s or later.

One of my co-workers is trying to figure out what she and her fiance are going to do with two complete homes. They are not the only ones.

When my mother remarried I scored a microwave and a wok. I know Roberta got cool stuff as well.

So here’s how it works: You throw the shower, take your duplicates and tie ribbons around them, get everyone drunk, and no one leaves without taking something.

It’s a winner!

The Do-Something Congress

They can’t stand up to funding Bush’s war in Iraq. They can’t stand up to oppose telecom immunity for illegal spying. They can’t stand up to carte blanche money thrown at the financial industry as a bail-out. But they can By God stand up to Roland Burris being seated as a senator.

I am so proud.

Tuesday trivia: All done

Short work again!

» Read more..

Tuesday Trivia: More quotes

1. “I should be sincerely sorry to see my neighbor’s children devoured by wolves.”
Solved by Melville (comment #1).

2. “Well, what if there is no tomorrow? There wasn’t one today.”
Solved by Tom Hilton (comment #2).

3. A: “I don’t want to die!”
B: “Neither do I, baby, but if I have to I’m gonna die last.”
Solved by Bill (comment #10).

4. “You don’t like it, do you _______, the storm? Show it your gun, why don’t you? If it doesn’t stop, shoot it. ”
Solved by Bill (comment #10).

5. “The way it works is, you do the thing you’re scared shitless of, and you get the courage after you do it, not before you do it.”
Solved by Tom Hilton (comment #3).

6. “How many times have I told you I hated you and believed it in my heart? How many times have you said you were sick and tired of me; that we were all washed up? How many times have we had to fall in love all over again?”
Solved by Melville (comment #1).

7. “Look! I have one job on this lousy ship, it’s stupid, but I’m gonna do it! Okay?”
Solved by Tom Hilton (comment #4).