Archive for Deborah Lipp

A pause for the frivilous discussion of television

As you know, I am a big fan of House.

I just found totally the coolest website: Medical discussions of the accuracy of each episode. Enjoy!

Men Aren’t Really From Mars

Today is International Women’s Day, as well as Blog Against Sexism Day. I had something else vaguely planned for today, but these thoughts started running through my mind late last night.

When I was a teenager, I knew a couple of girls, my own age, who were lesbian separatists. When I first met them, I thought this meant they just wanted to live apart from men. But no! They believed that the human race was originally female. They believed that men were invaders from outer space, who had stolen women’s natural partheogenic abilities to control us. They believed if we could kill off or drive away all men, partheogenesis would reemerge on its own.

Even when I was fourteen, this made my brain hurt. Besides being, y’know, whacky, I thought it was pretty high risk. I mean, what if you did get rid of all the men, and the partheogenesis thing didn’t happen?

But what I want to say here is: That isn’t feminism.

Isn’t.

» Read more..

Theocracy in Missouri

As widely reported in the blogosphere, Missouri wishes to make Christianity the official state religion.

House Concurrent Resolution 13 has is pending in the state legislature…

The resolution would recognize “a Christian god,??? and it would not protect minority religions, but “protect the majority’s right to express their religious beliefs.

I have seen some Wiccans shrug at this. They point out this is a non-binding resolution, not a law. They point out that Wicca has always been hidden, so what’s the big?

The obvious intent here is to make an inroad towards establishment. They are trying to further the tiresome and self-serving meme that Chrisitianity is “oppressed” in the U.S. They are doing this to undermine the idea that it is minority religion and non-religion that requires protection. The right is all about talking points. It’s all about selling a story. Truthiness. Missouri is trying to sell the story that Christianity is oppressed, must be protected, and can be made a state religion. That they skirt the letter of the law to do so is beside the point.

And as to the “hidden Wicca” idea? Hide to be discreet and private. Hide to work the Witches Pyramid. Hide to preserve the Mysteries. But when they come to drag us out of our homes, to take our jobs, our children, our lives?

Don’t hide. Fight.

Oscar Impressions

Jon Stewart: Funnier behind a news desk. Bring back Steve Martin.

Did you notice that everyone stood very far away from Isaac Mizrhai? Every interview I saw was all about the women commanding maximum personal space.

Lauren Bacall: Staggering drunk. Who knew?

Dolly Parton! Oh. My. Goddess. It’s not the hideous plastic surgery, I think, so much as that everyone has the same hideous plastic surgery. The same huge floating lips. The same bulging yet shapely eyes. The same unnaturally carved cheekbones. Add that to her pre-existing wildly improbable figure and…I dunno, was she singing or something? My ears were ringing.

Joaquin Phoenix: Still in character.

» Read more..

Monday Movie Review: Murderball

Murderball (2005) 9/10
Quad rugby (“murderball”) players are followed from the World Championships in 2002 to the Paralympics Games of 2004. Quad rugby, or wheelchair rugby, is played by quadriplegics in specially-adapted and reinforced chairs. (Documentary)

In the movies, people in wheelchairs are a finite number of things. They are tragic, uplifting, inspiring, angry, brave, hopeful, or heartwarming. In Murderball, they’re guys. (Women in wheelchairs are seen only peripherally in the film.) Specifically, they’re guys on a sports team. In fact, if you want to generalize, they’re more typical of what you may think about athletes than of what you may think about the disabled. They’re interested in playing hard, proving themselves, partying, and picking up girls. They pull pranks, they roughhouse, they boast. They’re guys.

In a way, I realized, this is an obvious and overlooked aspect of quadriplegia. Many such injuries are acquired in typically macho ways: Extreme sports, bar fights, pranks gone wrong, drunk driving, war. We see the way that the injured have to rebuild their self-image, and nothing makes more sense than that they rebuild the macho part as well.

The basic story follows two men. Mark Zupan is one of the stars of the U.S. quad rugby team. One day he was out partying and fell asleep, drunk, in the back of his friend’s pickup truck. Later his friend, driving drunk, and with no idea Mark was in the back, crashed the truck. Zupan was thrown sixty feet and hung onto a tree in a canal for thirteen hours until someone heard his cries for help. We meet his girlfriend, we attend his high school reunion, and ultimately, we meet the driver of the pickup truck.

Joe Soares had childhood polio. He was a star of the U.S. team for years. When he was cut from the team (a coach says simply that age slowed him down) he sued, unsuccessfully, to get back on. Now he coaches the Canadian team and the rivalry between his former and current teams runs deep. We meet Joe’s wife and his son. The younger Soares is interested in music and academics, not sports, which creates tension between the two.

We also meet a recently injured man, Keith, who is first learning to face his injury. We follow him from the early days of rehab, through a meeting with Zupan at a presentation on quad rugby, where Keith is excited by the freedom and strength he feels in the rugby chair.

Murderball is a masterful film. The editing seamlessly carries you through a huge range of facets of the lives of these men. Just writing this up made me realize how very much I’d seen. We are educated about spinal cord injury, we traverse family relationships, sexuality, competition, guilt, friendship, family, remorse, anger, and play. The competitions are exciting, there’s humor, there’s even heartwarming stuff. We are allowed to draw conclusions without being pushed.

The meeting with Keith brought up the eternal question about documentaries; who are the documentarians, and what are they doing? Clearly, the filmmakers arranged for Zupan to make a presentation where Keith would be present, but how did they pick Keith in particular? How did they decide he would ultimately be excited about quad rugby? Did they follow several recently injured people in the hopes that one of them would be? These are the sort of questions I wish documentaries in general would answer.

Barbara Broccoli is in denial

I love this quote:

“His teeth are fine, his driving is fine, he doesn’t have heat rash and he’s not afraid of the water.”

CBn has a good summary of this Variety article, interviewing co-producer Barbara Broccoli on the new Bond movie and Daniel Craig.

Double-oh! oh! oh!

Presumably, the Gods of Blogging demand I comment on this article that suggests Daniel Craig will appear nude in Casino Royale.

I don’t buy it. First of all: The Daily Mirror is the source. So…reliable? Not so much. Secondly, the Mirror article doesn’t actually say Craig will be nude, just that he’s willing to be. And since he’s been nude on-screen before (which pictures are peppering the ‘net), that’s not a stretch of the imagination.

It’s just not going to happen. Bond movies are PG-13. Sony won’t risk reducing the teen audience by putting an R rating on it. This is just a p.r. move (ill-considered, in my opinion) to make Craig seem edgier and more interesting after being plagued by one gaffe after another. It also raises interest in the carpet-beater scene, as the prurient wonder how much of that we’ll actually see.

Update: What we might see, as some clever posters at CBn have pointed out, is a suggestion of Craig’s nudity, from a distance or at a PG-13 angle, to lend credibility to the carpet-beater scene.

Visited States

Tried to skip the ones I just passed through:

» Read more..

What is it…?

What is it that makes people think the author is the work? The artist is the art?

There was a commenter here who basically said that, because I was rude to her, she wouldn’t recommend The Way of Four anymore. Did The Way of Four get worse overnight?

I see this all the time, especially (but not exclusively) among Pagans. People who pan Oberon’s book because it markets towards Hogwarts types. “Oh,” they say, “He’s so caught up in fantasy.” And y’know, Oberon is caught up in fantasy. He loves it, it enriches him. But does that say anything about the book? I mean, shouldn’t you at least flip through it before deciding whether or not it’s good?

Authors are human. Oberon loves fantasy, to the point where sometimes it’s silly. Isaac loves polemics, to the point where sometimes it’s really gorram annoying. I am opinionated and sometimes bitchy.

So what?

So the first thing, I guess, is why does that have anything to do with our writing? But the other thing is, why should writing be perfect for it to be commendable? Maybe Oberon’s book has too much fantasy for your taste, and has some excellent magical stuff. I think if you sit home and wait for the perfect book, you won’t read much.

I think a smart person, a good reader, a discerning adult, knows how to separate author from work or singer from song, and also knows how to separate wheat from chaff.

I wrote to one of my favorite authors about one of her books. I was such a huge fan. I’d seen her lecture a couple of times. And the answer I got back was, well, snotty. Knocked the stars right out of my eyes, poor me. But I still recommend her book because it’s still a great book. I won’t invite her to my birthday party, but heck, she won’t invite me to hers.

The burden is on the reader, really, to make those distinctions, and to allow the writer to be a human being. Because we will be, regardless.

What American City Are You?


You Are Austin


A little bit country, a little bit rock and roll.
You’re totally weird and very proud of it.
Artistic and freaky, you still seem to fit in… in your own strange way.

Famous Austin residents: Lance Armstrong, Sandra Bullock, Andy Roddick