Archive for James Bond

Double-oh! oh! oh!

Presumably, the Gods of Blogging demand I comment on this article that suggests Daniel Craig will appear nude in Casino Royale.

I don’t buy it. First of all: The Daily Mirror is the source. So…reliable? Not so much. Secondly, the Mirror article doesn’t actually say Craig will be nude, just that he’s willing to be. And since he’s been nude on-screen before (which pictures are peppering the ‘net), that’s not a stretch of the imagination.

It’s just not going to happen. Bond movies are PG-13. Sony won’t risk reducing the teen audience by putting an R rating on it. This is just a p.r. move (ill-considered, in my opinion) to make Craig seem edgier and more interesting after being plagued by one gaffe after another. It also raises interest in the carpet-beater scene, as the prurient wonder how much of that we’ll actually see.

Update: What we might see, as some clever posters at CBn have pointed out, is a suggestion of Craig’s nudity, from a distance or at a PG-13 angle, to lend credibility to the carpet-beater scene.

Bumping the Bond Discussion

This conversation about Daniel Craig has been building up a lively comments section. Take a peek.

I said it first

This author thinks (some) Bond fans should get a life.

Possibly he’s been reading my blog.

Moviefone readers are not Eva Green fans

Via CBn, the survey (right side of page) is running 83% against Eva Green as Vesper Lynd.

I am the world’s biggest Pollyanna, but the publicity for this movie has been disasterous from day one, and it ain’t getting better.

People who really, REALLY need a life

You know I love James Bond. You know I was furious at the casting of Daniel Craig. But on the subject of this boycott, may I say, most emphatically, GIVE ME A BREAK.

Here are some hard numbers, folks. Die Another Day grossed about 424 million dollars.
The biggest Bond fansite has fewer than 10,000 registered members. Let’s round up. If every single one of ten thousand fans committed to boycotting Casino Royale, and stuck to it (because do you really think no one will go and watch it anyway, just out of curiousity, or to satisfy a Jones?), then that’s a potential loss to Sony/Eon of…

$100,000. Max.

That’s two hundredths of a percent of what DAD earned. Point. Oh. Two. Percent. If the boycott is unbelievably successful.

So shut up, buy your movie ticket, and see what happens. Maybe you’ll be right and you can tell everyone how you knew all along Craig would suck. Maybe you’ll be wrong and it’ll be a good movie. Or a great one. Or just stay home and let other people enjoy the greatest secret agent of all time without making a whole lot of fuss just because you’re a nerd with an Internet connection.

Big Bond News! Cast Announced

Damn, I’ve been holding my breath so long I think I popped blood vessels in my eyes.

CBn has the story.

Following yesterday’s announcement about Mads Mikkelsen cast as Casino Royale‘s Bond villain Le Chiffre, today brings more casting news. This afternoon Eon, MGM and Sony Pictures announced that French actress Eva Green has been cast to play opposite Daniel Craig (James Bond) as the enticing Vesper Lynd. Eva Green starred with Orlando Bloom in 2005’s Kingdom of Heaven and was introduced in 2003’s The Dreamers.

It was also announced that Jeffrey Wright has joined the cast and will play the part of Felix Leiter. Jeffery Wright played Winston opposite Bill Murray in 2005’s Broken Flowers as well as appearing in 2005’s Syriana. Not only do we now know who will be portraying the main characters in Casino Royale, the 21st James Bond film, but along with today’s press release came a list of the rest of the cast as well.

Casino Royale’s Cast List

Daniel Craig as James Bond
Eva Green as Vesper Lynd
Mads Mikkelsen as Le Chiffre
Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter
Giancarlo Giannini as Mathis
Caterina Murino as Solonge
Simon Abkarian as Dimitrios
Tobias Menzies as Villiers
Ivana Milicevic as Valenka
Clemens Schick as Kratt
Ludger Pistor as Mendel
Claudio Santamaria as Carlos

I have to say that Giannini and Wright as allies are thrilling.

Updated: I have managed to find pictures of everyone! Enjoy.

Who Is Your Bond Film Alter Ego?

You shake and stir us as Tiffany Case!

Oh James! You’re the sneaky smuggler Tiffany Case who relishes the fact that diamonds are forever. Your eyes are drawn to the sparkling things in life and why not? You’re a lady with high standards and the looks and style to match. However, while you love keeping up with the latest fashion trends, you’re probably most comfortable in a skimpy bikini, preferably with a cool drink and a swimming pool nearby. A hunky lad to put sun tan lotion on your back would be a nice distraction. We think you’d prefer the easy life, but expensive tastes and a relaxing lifestyle are not comfortable bed partners. Just remember that unless you marry into money you’re going to have to earn those lazy holidays, so try to plan ahead and make the most of your bikini time when you’re there. Despite your laid back attitude to life we think there’s room in your life for a few risks and excitement. After all even the perfect cocktail needs mixing up – whether it’s shaken or just stirred.

Take the test!

Felix Leiter is back!

Great news for Bond fans. Via CBn, director Martin Campbell confirms that Casino Royale will feature the character of Felix Leiter.

Long-time fans adore the Texan CIA agent, who was introduced in Ian Fleming’s first novel, Casino Royale, and introduced to movie fans in Bond’s first movie, Dr. No. Leiter appeared in eight Bond films (counting Never Say Never Again), and was portrayed by seven different actors. He was last seen on-screen in Licence to Kill (played for the second time by David Hedison), in which he was mutilated by a shark. Presumably, and in keeping with the “Bond begins” motif, he will have both arms and legs in Casino Royale.

This Bond fan is very happy about the news. Can’t wait to hear about the casting. (Of course, casting is a problem…)

Monday Movie Review: Munich

Munich 10/10
After Black September murders eleven Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics in 1972, Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier authorizes the creation of a covert assassination squad to avenge the deaths.

Steven Spielberg has created a masterful work. It is moving without being manipulative, disturbing without being grotesque; it shows great restraint and bravado excess.

The arguments against this film seem to be three: That it is too anti-Israel, that it is too pro-Israel, and that it is historically false. One would hope the very fact that the first two arguments co-exist would cancel them out, but that’s probably optimistic. » Read more..

Bond Girls Are Forever

Via Carnival of Feminists 7, I found this post on Bond girls vs. Bond women. The writer deplores the sexualization of girls (“Bond girls” says one actress, is a “sexier” phrase than “Bond women”), and that is certainly a good point. On the other hand, the writer admits to neither knowing nor liking Bond films.

In my book, I do use the term Bond girls, and I also go to some length explaining why I do, and why a feminist can love Bond. The short version of the use of the term is that “Bond girl” is a meme. It isn’t the same as a “Bond woman.” A Bond woman is a woman in a Bond film. She could be Judi Dench, playing Bond’s boss with great skill. She could be eye candy, a woman hanging out poolside in a bikini but never interacting with 007. Both of these are Bond women, but neither plugs into the “Bond girl” meme. For that reason, I persist in using the sexist terminology.

The other thing is that every Bond girl has said she’s not “just” a Bond girl “like the others.” Honor Blackman says it all the time, and she was in the third movie; that’s pretty early on, isn’t it? Well, Ursula Andress has also said it, and she was in the first movie! The fact is, the “bubble-headed bleach blonde” stereotype attached to the meme has never been all that true.

Virtually every woman in the first seven Bond films has been self-directed, independent, strong, owned her own sexuality, and sometimes beat Bond at his own game. Okay, not all of them were exactly as independent or strong as all of the others, but the trend was there from Day (or Film) One. It wasn’t until Roger Moore came along that Bond girls were helpless eye candy in desperate need of rescue. The first four women (in his first two films) were all wimpering idiots. But then, I’ve never been a Moore fan.

What is more interesting to me, as a feminist, is not the whole “girl” vs. “woman” thing, but how a stereotype developed despite the existing evidence. (That stereotype was solidly in place by the early 1960s, and Moore didn’t come along until 1972.) I think the sexual aggression and independence of these women was so threatening that it was easier, and safer, to see them just as beautiful and objectified. (True, they were cast for looks, but so was Connery, so was Moore.) I think to be a beautiful woman in an action film engendered the stereotype despite the evidence. And I think that Bond girls rock.