Property of a Lady
Deborah Lipp goes on about Wicca, politics, movies, Paganism, and cats. Not necessarily in that order.

 

2/28/2006

Why are some people so clueless?

Particularly, clueless about Teh Gay. I’ve been meaning to blog about this for a while, but misty at Shakespeare’s Sister alerted me to this completely insane story.

I’ll give you the short version: Nine women are suing Clay Aiken’s record label for leading them to believe he was straight.

They allege that employees of RCA, Sony/BMG, and Aiken himself “engaged in collusion to prevent public disclosures they believed might be harmful to their product”.

The angry ladies go on to state, “This is tantamount to a manufacturer concealing information about a defective product. Therefore these actions were both unfair and deceptive to consumers.”

A spokeswoman for the group says, “As consumers, we feel ripped off. It is obvious now that the private Clay is very different from the manufactured packaged public Clay that was marketed to us.”

Okay, there’s just lots and lots that’s dumb about this, and frankly, my brain cells are popping like bubble wrap just trying to think it through.

(more…)

Filed under: Favorites, Miscellany and Whatever — deblipp @ 2:30 pm

Bumping the Bond Discussion

This conversation about Daniel Craig has been building up a lively comments section. Take a peek.

Filed under: James Bond — deblipp @ 11:45 am

2/27/2006

Wow

A lot of people on the left, myself included, have been just furious with the New York Times for its shameful behavior regarding Judith Miller. But if this isn’t some sort of redemption, I don’t know what is.

Filed under: Politics — deblipp @ 10:30 pm

Possibly the best paragraph I will read this week

From Ebert’s review of Running Scared:

Speaking of movies that go over the top, “Running Scared” goes so far over the top, it circumnavigates the top and doubles back on itself; it’s the Mobius Strip of over-the-topness. I am in awe. It throws in everything but the kitchen sink. Then it throws in the kitchen sink, too, and the combo washer-dryer in the laundry room, while the hero and his wife are having sex on top of it.

Read the whole thing. It rocks.

Filed under: Fun with Language, Movies & TV — deblipp @ 10:49 am

Monday Movie Review: Good Night, and Good Luck.

Good Night, and Good Luck. (2005) 10/10
Television journalist Edward R. Murrow (David Straithairn) and producer Fred Friendly (George Clooney) go after Senator Joseph McCarthy.

There are lots and lots of movies “based on a true story.” For the past two years,three of the five Academy Award Best Picture nominees have been fact-based. These movies invariably embellish the truth. They give us back stories that don’t exist, or that are different from the real story in significant ways. Always, a dry story is warmed up, a political story is made somehow personal. Always, until Good Night, and Good Luck.

The story of Murrow’s battle against McCarthyism is stripped bare. We never meet Murrow’s wife, or hear him explain the inner demon that drives him. We never see our main characters at home, or having expository conversations. Only a couple played by Robert Downey Jr. and Patricia Clarkson are given the least little bit of a personal life. Instead, we see the newsroom, the conversations, the editing, the interviews. Murrow’s speeches are virtually all derived from transcripts of what he actually said. To cap off this incredible veracity, McCarthy and some of the McCarthy hearings are real archival footage, not recreations.

Does this sound boring? It isn’t. George Clooney’s deft direction makes it compelling, edge of your seat stuff. Nor is it without opinon. I’ve heard complaints that Good Night, and Good Luck. is a hagiography, but Murrow and Friendly’s characters are not portrayed at all, only their actions. The movie has an opinion, a strong one, but it lets the events themselves tell the story. In fact, the lack of exposition is remarkable; no one explains HUAC (or even tells you what it stands for), or explains who McCarthy is or what he’s been up to. The audience just has to keep up.

What we’re left with is a story remarkably necessary for today; dramatic, thrilling, and inspiring. The direction is smart, and the acting is top-notch. The look of the piece; black and white, with lots of close-ups that study faces with intensity, is striking. It creates a period feel deftly, without mockery. The cast, including Frank Langella, Jeff Daniels, and Ray Wise, has a great naturalism; no one looks like a movie star (except Clooney). Everyone seems to just melt into their characters, so that the juxtaposition of archival footage and acting is seamless.

I have to make special note of the remarkable use of music. Jazz singer Dianne Reeves plays a studio singer. The deft placement of her songs comments on the action. She’s terrific, using Clooney’s aunt’s arrangements, and it’s almost like a musical the way that the songs speak to and about the story.

I can’t recommend GN&GL highly enough. As a mother, I’m so glad to have taken my son to see it. This is an educational movie in exactly the right way; neither condescending nor dry, it is to history lessons as cayenne pepper is to a dash of salt.

Filed under: Movies & TV — deblipp @ 9:56 am
Next Page »
Copyright © 2005-2008, Deborah Lipp. All rights reserved.

Powered by WordPress

This blog has been fine-tuned with 3 WordPress Tweaks.