Archive for July 24, 2007

Whedonverse Trivia Open Thread

It’s Tuesday…you have to get your trivia fix. I understand. So while I don’t have one of Deborah’s carefully crafted quizzes on hand, I do know that there must be trivia on Tuesday.

So this week we’ll do something a little different: a Whedonverse trivia open thread.

Here’s how it works: I post a trivia question (related to Buffy, Angel, or Firefly); whoever answers correctly gets to post another one; and so on, for as long as people want to keep it going. If you’re certain of your answer, go ahead and post the question; if not, let someone confirm first. If you don’t have a good question to hand, you can waive, and then it’s open to the first person to post a question.

So here’s a not-too-difficult starting question: What distinction do Angel and Harmony (and only Angel and Harmony) share?

Random Flickr-Blogging: IMG_3588


Uploaded by oberlep27

Breaking: braindead ravenous flesh-eating zombies have seized the nation’s capital.

But then I guess you knew that already.

[Random Flickr-blogging explained]

Monday Movie Review: Superman Returns

Superman Returns (2006) 4/10
Superman (Brandon Routh) returns to Metropolis after a five year absence, to find that Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth) has a son and a fiance (James Marsden), and that Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) is out of jail. Directed by Bryan Singer.

Superman Returns
is a ponderous, overlong, uneventful bore of a movie. It reminds me a great deal of Ang Lee‘s disasterous Hulk; the same deadly sense of self-importance, preventing it even from being “so bad it’s good,” the same obsession with fathers and sons, the same occasional reminders that a usually talented director is at the helm.

Perhaps the worst flaw of this film is it has no idea what it wants to be. Singer never decides if he is continuing the Christopher Reeve Superman films, or remaking them, or perhaps doing a homage. If it is a continuation, then the many repeated scenes from Superman: The Movie are inappropriate. If it is a remake, then why the painstaking effort to fill in the gaps between the two films? And if a homage, we got it at the first repeated line, 10 minutes in, and we didn’t need the bludgeoning.

Brandon Routh in the starring role is absolutely dreadful. I mean awful. I mean he makes Andie McDowell look like she can act. It’s scary how bad this guy is. He spends a lot of time doing Christopher Reeve imitations, and he’s passably good at imitating Reeve as Clark Kent (although he has none of Reeve’s gentle dignity as Superman), but he brings nothing of his own to the role. I watched the movie with my sister, and she pointed out that they needed to trust the character, not the actor who played him definitively. Routh’s imitation kills the series in the same way that a Sean Connery imitator would have killed James Bond. Christopher Reeve remains the biggest crush I have ever had in my life, from the first time I saw Superman in 1980 in a drive-in until today, I have never loved an actor half as much. But I don’t want to see Routh or anyone else playing Reeve’s Superman, if the movie is worth making, they have to make the character their own. So maybe this one wasn’t worth making.

Kate Bosworth must be thanking her lucky stars she’s acting opposite Routh, because only in such a pairing is she the talented one. She’s all wrong for Lois Lane, a character who is angular and sharp. Her character is actually well-written though, and has more to do than most iterations of Lois, but Bosworth isn’t persuasive.

From time to time, Superman Returns has flourishes that remind you Bryan Singer really can do good things behind the camera. There’s a lovely bit where he’s flying and rolls onto his back to use his heat vision while continuing to fly. It’s the sort of clever and inventive use of character and plot that I admire in a film. If all of the little good bits were strung together with, I dunno, a script, and a cast, well, they’d really have something.

Okay, there is a cast. At least a supporting cast. Spacey is absolutely fantastic. He brings real conviction to the part. And I’m a little freaked out by how sexy I find Frank Langella. But I do, and also he can act. Sam Huntington is charming as Jimmy Olsen.

But make no mistake: None of these charms make the movie worth seeing.

Tammy Faye Messner, 1942 – 2007

You’ve doubtless heard by now that Tammy Faye Messner has died. Melissa McEwen reposts a sweet, moving tribute (from a couple of years ago) that I think is the best eulogy I’ve seen. Here’s a taste (then go read the rest):

Even though her husband, and many of their PTL associates, seemed like insincere rabble, just out for the last dimes in the handbags of little old ladies, Tammy always struck me as the genuine article—a woman who was filled with boundless faith and love. She also seemed like someone with whom I’d really enjoy sitting and having a long conversation, diametrically different as we are, because she was interesting and thoughtful, and most of all, very funny….

Tammy Faye proved herself to be the genuine article after all, ignoring the increasingly vitriolic anti-gay noise from much of the evangelical community, and becoming an out-spoken gay rights advocate, even penning a gay youth advice column, raising awareness about the disproportionate incidences of teen suicide among gay teens, criticizing the church for not welcoming gays, and celebrating pride festivities with her new legions of gay fans. Tammy Faye had been a drag icon for years (it’s all about the make-up!), but her activism wasn’t motivated by a realization there was a community she could cynically exploit for a comeback; instead she was moved by a desire to make sure that desperate gay teens knew they were loved, too. Even if their churches, their friends, or even their parents didn’t…she did.

Tammy Faye Messner proved Fitzgerald wrong with a second act that redeemed the grotesque farce of her first. She will be missed.

Sunday Sierrablogging


Half Dome and the Clark Range from above Yosemite Falls, Yosemite National Park.

Friday Catblogging: Starwood Cometh

And so the suitcase is out.

Is this your suitcase?
Is this ur sootcaze?

» Read more..

Hittin’ the Road, Jack

At ohgod o’clock on Sunday morning, I leave for Starwood, as I do every year about this time. I will, of course, take notes for the third annual “things you hear only at Starwood” post.

As usual, Tom will be guest-blogging. I’ve also left behind some posts of my own to keep you entertained.

Think warm, dry thoughts!

Fun With Language: Breakfast Edition

We are having a company breakfast, there is food and people serving themselves and a touch of chaos, and I overhear

In the abyss of my memory, there is an orange juice floating around.

An Artistic Encounter

A long time ago, my friend Cindy sent me a beautiful card. I loved it so much I displayed it in the kitchen, where it has proceeded to get splashed and misshapen from being too close to the sink. At one point I did some ‘net searching, hoping to find a nice print of the image, but came up empty.

Since I recently repainted, I have taken down—and must rehang—all my posters, and while talking about my artwork, this particular print came up in conversation. It reminded me, I said, of Flaming June by Frederic Leighton.

So this morning I decided to try again. And what I found was that I had searched for the wrong name before. (I searched for the name of the card company. d’Oh!) What I was looking for was Dolce Far Niente, by John William Godward.

So I found it! And having found Godward, I found I was quite taken with a lot of his work. I looked at a lot, and some of it reminded me of something.

Maybe fifteen years ago (maybe more), the back cover of Gnosis Magazine had this painting that I loved so much I pulled it off and had it framed. It was the Oracle of Delphi, but in a style that struck me as incongruous, and yet compelling. The Godward paintings reminded me of that, so I did more searching, and you guessed it, it’s a Godward.

This just blows my mind. Here is a painter that I never heard of, and that no one I know has ever mentioned, although he is at least as ripe with Pagan overtones as Waterhouse or Rosetti (another favorite of mine), and yet, I had managed to come across, and save, two different Godward paintings, without even realizing they were by the same artist!

And hey? Here’s the first line of the “Works” section in Wikipedia:

Godward was a Victorian Neo-classicist, and therefore a follower in theory of Frederic Leighton.

You remember Leighton, right? He started this whole train of thought by painting Flaming June.

So all of this teaches me something about the nature of taste, about being drawn to certain things without knowing why, but perhaps that’s a subject for another post.

Dolce Far Niente below the fold. » Read more..

Solutions to Dance Trivia

You guys rock.

» Read more..