Archive for Deborah Lipp

Monday Movie Review: About Schmidt

About Schmidt (2002) 6/10

Warren Schmidt (Jack Nicholson) has just retired, and his wife has just died. Empty and sad, he journeys to his daughter’s (Hope Davis) wedding.

An entire thesis could be, and perhaps has been, written about the role in this film of Kathy Bates’s naked ass. By the time Schmidt arrives in Denver to meet the parents of his future son-in-law Randall (Dermot Mulroney), we are relieved by their warmth. Roberta (Bates) has a home painted in deep rusts and golds, decorated with art and musical instruments, and she dresses in a flowing purple caftan. After an hour of Schmidt’s sorrowful, repressed, seething grays and tans and blues, arriving in Denver is like finding a warm fire after trudging through the snow. » Read more..

Reviews up

So, I’ve now got a small page of reviews for The Way of Four Spellbook up.

(And weirdly, as I’m in the middle of typing this, I seem to have been upgraded. So halfway through a post, I’m in a different editor. You try it sometime.)

Where do people go?

People disappear. It’s one of life’s mysteries, one I often wonder about.

Sitting next to my keyboard is the contact information for a young man very interested in learning traditional Wicca (the kind I teach). He came with referrals. We had a good conversation. He was enthusiastic. I told him I was sending an application (everyone enters my group with an application). I sent the application. (Actually, the first time it bounced, then I got the right email and re-sent.) Nothing. Never heard again.

The thing is, this happens all the time. In my years of teaching Wicca, I’ve sent thirty applications for every one I got back.

But this isn’t a Wicca thing. I mean, when I think about the dating…! Because this is commonplace, isn’t it? You meet someone, or you’re about to meet someone, and all of a sudden, they’re gone. Poof. Puff of invisible smoke. And following up is mostly useless.

Sometimes it’s even people who have been in your life a while. They stop returning phone calls. You didn’t fight or even disagree. They just stopped being there. And sometimes that’s very sad.

But mostly it’s mysterious. Mostly it just speaks to the vast space between you and me. We think we know each other but we don’t. We reach out to each other, but sometimes we don’t connect. The thoughts in your head are unknown to me, and mine are unknown to you, and the times we really know each other are wonderful in part because they are rare.

Some people hate the Internet (clearly not the people reading this). They think more tech is less touch. But I think anything that keeps us connected is for the good. When I think about why I blog, is it worth it, am I killing time typing “little” things instead of writing the next book, I come back to this. That I am connecting. I have not disappeared.

What’s that odor?

I wake up to morning news on WCBS AM. (I find that if I wake up to music, there is considerably less “waking up” involved.) I am often bemused by how conservative a CBS station is—you know, the network of Dan Rather and all that. But today takes the cake.

Yesterday, I woke up to the story of the NSA tracking millions (!) of American phone calls. CBS presented me with two “person in the street” voices (for “balance”), one was mildly concerned, the other was a man saying “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about” (only with a New York accent) (moron) (y’think his name was Winston Smith?).

So today, the headline is that everyone is exploding about these revelations, both ordinary people and politicians. This time, three sound clips:

  • The same moron saying he had nothing to hide (presumably they could only find one person that stupid)
  • A politician (sounded like Hastert, can’t be sure) saying that breaches of national security (i.e. the story itself) were of grave concern, and
  • A woman with a Hispanic accent saying she was concerned about her privacy.

Your lesson, boys and girls? Real Americans think this is okay. Suspicious brown people with accents worry about (sniff, snort, hehehe) “privacy”.

That funny odor you smell is the Constitution burning.

Friday Kittenblogging: The All-Fanty Edition

After the All-Mingo edition, I promised her…

Fanty shows off her post-op shave
Not exactly a Brazilian

» Read more..

Duke Car Theft Revisited

Over on Pandagon, they’re discussing the way that “innocent until proven guilty” gets used in rape cases as a gloss for “blame the victim.” This is ground we’ve covered before.

Amanda says:

The other thing I’ve learned from rape apologists lately is that while in most crimes, the presumption of innocence is a legal standard for determining if a defendent is guilty or not, but when it comes to rape, that’s not good enough. Rape and rape alone is a crime where it’s critical that we heap disdain on the victim and refuse to believe her until it’s proven in court, which should be easy to do after everyone has satiated him/herself on accusing the victim of lying.

And as I’ve said before, if you told someone your car was stolen, whether that someone is a cop or a prosecutor or a friend, the reaction would not be, “Well, were you driving in a dangerous neighborhood? Were you drinking? Did you leave it unlocked?” followed by disbelief that the car was actually stolen. That just wouldn’t be the reaction. “Asking for it” doesn’t come into the conversation about other crimes, about theft or physical assault or what have you.

A smart commentator on this post says, in regard to the presumption of innocence:

Filing a false police report and lying under oath are crimes. Young, O’Reilly, and their ilk always accuse rape victims of those crimes. Don’t rape victims have a presumption of innocence?

Of course, in our world, rape victims don’t have a presumption of innocence, either socially or in the eyes of the law. But we need to change that, and we can’t be stopped from changing that by the fact that sometimes, in rare cases, some victims (of various crimes, not just rape) are lying. Believing the victim is the decent thing to do.

Fab new review

After stressing out (just a wee tad) over a bad review, I’ve got a fabulous one for The Way of Four Spellbook in hand. I’ll be posting it on the main website just as soon as I get the source (I have the author, but I don’t know where it will appear or has already appeared).

Michael Gleason writes:

If this is your first exposure to spellbooks, congratulations – you have made a good choice, and one which will serve to demystify the entire process of spellcasting. If, on the other hand, you have already had experience in spellwork, this book may expose you to a differing approach which can expand your base of knowledge. In either case the money spent for this book will be a good investment.

Thanks, Michael!

How Low Can You Go?

31%.

Mr. Bush’s overall job approval rating hit another new low, 31 percent, tying the low point of his father in July 1992, four months before the elder Mr. Bush lost his bid for a second term to Bill Clinton. That is the third lowest approval rating of any president in 50 years; only Richard M. Nixon and Jimmy Carter were viewed less favorably.

Mr. Bush is even losing support from what has been his base: 51 percent of conservatives and 69 percent of Republicans approve of the way Mr. Bush is handling his job. In both cases, those figures are a substantial drop in support from four months ago.

Can I hear an Amen?

Art education without nudity?

This story caught my attention (initially because it’s local: I have friends with kids in this school district). In sum, a high school art teacher (and we can pause to be briefly amused at the name of Peter Panse) has been suspended for telling his advanced students that they could further their skills by taking drawing classes that include nude figure studies, and for suggesting he might teach such a class, which chaperoned students could attend. (By the way, I have no idea why this guy was suspended in December, but I heard it on the news today.)

Pete Panse is a talented and popular high school art teacher in Middletown, NY who uses traditional techniques to to train his students. In December 2005 Mr. Panse was suspended from his job for recommending that some of his advanced students consider taking figure drawing courses that included nude figure drawings. Mr. Panse is suspended from his job pending hearings after which he may be permanently fired, ending a 25-year teaching career. In the meantime, his students are sitting in study hall learning nothing and failing to prepare the materials necessary for their receiving scholarships.

This blows my mind. Do people think that high school students don’t understand that beneath our clothing there’s nekkidness? Are they unaware that art education requires teh nekkid? Do they think their art student teens haven’t already drawn teh nudie?

Did you know that “prude” has three letters in common with “stupid”? Coincidence?

Whatever. The current wave of pseudo-religious prudery is perhaps the dumbest and most ignorant in the history of pseudo-religious prudery. It rivals the Scopes trial for sheer dumbass head-up-assity. Meanwhile, a man’s career is at stake and art students ain’t learning art. My high school art classes were the highlight of my day. In fact, I was just reminiscing about them yesterday. The teacher focused his efforts on Art as Meaning, “what is art,” and art’s connection to life. We drew constantly, and we often posed for each other to help capture an angle or a shadow. We often discussed that we would need nude figure study education to further our abilities, and wasn’t it a shame that wasn’t available in high school. But, y’know, we were allowed to discuss that.

There’s a petition you can sign.

I am having a bad morning

I don’t even know why I went into Arthur’s bathroom. I was suspicious of some manner of feline behavior. I was butt nekkid, being about to step into the shower, when I just peeked in there to see what the Gang of Two was up to, and I discovered (the horror)…

that some unnamed member of the Gang had peed all over the bathroom rug.

» Read more..