Archive for Deborah Lipp

I’m back

I’m kind of exhausted. I had a great time. The people in Louisville are awesome. Gaia’s Spiral (formerly Widdershins) is a great shop with gorgeous handcrafts, art, and ritual objects, and very few books. But lots of MY books. I did readings and talks and then I went to Louisville Pagan Pride and did four million readings. Four. Million. And then there was a party and it’s true what they say about Kentucky and bourbon. Like wow.

So I promise that blogging will resume. I have a movie to review but it might not go up until much later today.

Monday Movie Review: Kinsey (another re-run)

I have a Netflix I’m pretty excited about, but I had to watch the Emmys for my other blog, and I had a lot of personal stuff to deal with, so I never watched a movie. Here’s another rerun. Sorry about that.


Kinsey (2004) 8/10
Biologist Alfred Kinsey (Liam Neeson) decides to focus his research efforts on human sexuality.

Kinsey is an interesting and complex movie. On the one hand, it’s a biopic, making an effort at telling the truth about work that was a breakthrough, and paved the way for an entire field of research. There was no such thing as sex research when Kinsey started, which is why he started, appalled that even the most basic questions about what constituted normal or usual sexuality could not be answered.

In another way, it’s a character study, taking quirky and difficult personalities and looking at them dispassionately. Kinsey is abrasive, disconnected from human feelings, self-important, and pedantic. His wife, Clara (Mac) McMillen (Laura Linney, in a radiant performance), can only be described as an odd duck. By comparison to Kinsey, she is warmth itself, but she, too, is awkward and disconnected, and could not possibly fit in with most people.

The Kinseys had what we’d describe now as a polyamorous relationship, at least at times. It seems most reviewers look at this movie and describe Mac as patient and long-suffering. Not unlike the way that most people describe women in polyamorous relationships, which they assume benefit men and impose upon women. But it seems pretty clear that both of the Kinseys are negotiating difficult emotional and sexual terrain, making mistakes, hurting themselves and each other, and finding some sort of way through. The interpersonal experimentation was probably inevitable in an environment where people were suddenly talking about sex when no one else did. Ultimately, they were also photographing and filming sex, and unsurprisingly, they could not remain dispassionate on the subject of arousal.

The third view of this movie is as a polemic about sexual secrecy, and here I find it most compelling. Kinsey reminds us of a world in which teenage boys were told they would die from masturbation, and were tortured and humiliated to prevent it. Where a woman could believe that “babies came out of navels” until her wedding night, and her husband could believe that oral sex caused infertility and must be avoided at all costs. For all of the flaws in Alfred Kinsey’s methods and sampling, he was a warrior against ignorance. He understood that sexuality was a basic human need and expression, and that to be confused and lost and afraid in regards to it was wrong. In our current era of abstinence-only “education” and purposeful misinformation about birth control, it is worth remembering the kind of world that the far right is trying to revert to.

Friday Catblogging: Strange Things Mingo Does

Mingo loves plastic bags.

Cat on Bag on Chair

Cat on Bag on Chair

This may look like a cat on a chair. It is not. It is a cat having a love affair with a plastic bag that happens to be on a chair. Soon he will begin to suck and chew it.

Frickin ew.

» Read more..

Fun with Spoken Language

I was having dinner with my family, and we were talking about blogging (yes, over a family dinner), and I said: “I guest-write on a blog…”

And two or three of them asked “What did you guess?”

“What?”

“You said you guessed right. Guessed what?”

“No, I guest-write. I am a guest-writer. I guest-write.”

“Oh!”

I had no clue I was saying something confusing.

Tuesday Trivia: Solved insanely fast

Wow. These name that actor quizzes are a HUGE pain in the butt to put together, and y’all cleaned them out in seconds.

» Read more..

Tuesday Trivia: The return of name that actor

These are three roles played by the same actor. Name the actor.

1. A notorious man dying of cancer, an expatriot boxer, a homesick Swedish sailor
Solved by Melville (comment #5).

2. An heiress with a troublesome younger sister, a fashion designer, a psychiatrist
Solved by Tom Hilton (comment #1 and 10).

3. An ambitious insurance actuary, a television cameraman, a naval ensign
Solved by Melville (comment #5).

4. A home health aide, an African political leader, a woman who meets people from the future
Solved by Melville (comment #6).

5. A security guard with strange abilities, the next-door neighbor of a dentist, a boxer
Solved by Tom Hilton (comment #2) and finished by Wendy (comment #9).

6. The wealthy patron of a famous painter, the father of a murder victim, a male stripper
Solved by George (comment #14).

7. An innocent man on death row, a comic book villain, a one-eyed chauffer
Solved by Wendy (comment #9).

Monday Movie Review: There Will Be Blood

There Will Be Blood (2007) 5/10
Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) is an oilman who will let nothing stop his drive towards success. He develops a lifelong adversity with a preacher (Paul Dano) who has enormous over a town where Plainview wishes to drill. Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson.

This was me giving P.T. Anderson one last chance. I didn’t like Boogie Nights, and I half-liked Magnolia (a beautiful mess if ever there was one), so this was Anderson’s last hurrah for me. Critics have said things like There Will Be Blood is his “most realized work” or whatever. To me it felt, in many ways, less recognizably Anderson: less histrionic until the bizarre final scene, but also less populous.

Part of the problem with this movie is there are no people in it, and no life. No one is living a life. No one makes love, eats, weeps, interacts, plays. It is a one-man show with a second man add-on. Daniel Plainview exists in a vacuum, and nothing breaks in to show us why we care about watching him for endless hours (and dear Lady, does this movie go on forever or what?). Daniel’s son, H.W., is a cipher, then he’s a deaf cipher; he’s never really a little boy. Plainview gives an early speech about the importance of families, but we see no women except peripherally, and few children.

I was strangely unimpressed with Daniel Day Lewis. I realize there is something blasphemous about impugning his God-like Acting Talents, but his Daniel Plainview didn’t draw me in. It was a less exciting performance than Gangs of New York, it was inhuman in its studied quality. Maybe that’s the point. Who knows?

I was looking for some kind of statement, it all seemed like it should have been symbolic; Capitalism vs. Religion or something, but no one in the film cared about those symbols, and ultimately I felt the movie failed as a vehicle of communication. I was told that the book it is based on, Oil by Upton Sinclair, is more or less a screed on behalf of socialism. And fine, I can see Anderson wanting to change that, but he should have changed to something. The symbols here are left dangling, like leftovers in the symbolism clearance department.

The cinematography is much-praised, but it was a dark, smokey, bleak film, and not the beautiful bleakness of John Ford’s Monument Valley. It felt like the landscape expressed the overall misery of Paul Sunday’s (Dano) flock, of Plainview’s life, of the movie itself.

Ultimately, it felt like wasted time. Now I know what “I drink your milkshake” means. So what?

Live Fun With Language

I saw a sign on the way home that said “Live Karaoke.”

As opposed to…?

Tattoo Review

I found out that an old friend—an ex-boyfriend, in fact—is featured in the current issue of Tattoo Review. So I went to Barnes and Noble to buy it. B&N carries…

Tattoo, Tattoo Flash, Tattoo Savage, Tattoo Energy, International Tattoo Art, Skin Art, Skin & Ink, and Inked.

Not Tattoo Review.

So I went to Borders, where I was told it would be, and found

Tattoo, Tattoo Flash, Tattoo Savage, Tattoo Energy, International Tattoo Art, Skin Art, Skin & Ink, Inked and Tattoos for Women.

Not Tattoo Review.

I hope he looked good and all.

“Labor” trivia: All solved

It was a boy, by the way.

» Read more..